A year ago, the superhero-industrial complex looked like it was on the wane. All three of Marvel’s big movies for 2025 underperformed to some degree or another, outgrossed by DC’s newest reboot of Superman – which itself made less than any number of previous-regime DC movies, and was followed up by this summer’s Supergirl, a costly bomb. It looked as if the age of heroes might be coming to an end, and only seemed fitting that the next big Avengers movie was subtitled Doomsday (and had resigned itself to sharing a release date with the Imax-grabbing release of a third Dune movie).
But look out, as the song goes: here comes Spider-Man.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day, the fourth solo film starring Tom Holland as the third live-action iteration of the character in the past 25 years, was always expected to do well at the box office this summer. Its predecessor, 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home, was the first movie since Covid to post 2010s-style numbers. At the same time, it seemed like an anomaly, given its advantage of two additional Spider-Men, as previous stars Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield returned for an unexpectedly moving curtain call to their versions of Peter Parker. Still: The (relatively) lower-grossing movies that sent those past Peters packing made a substantial amount of money, too, so there was a general understanding that Spider-Man would be a perennial favorite and Brand New Day would do accordingly well.
Yet a few months ago, hardly anyone predicted that it would swoop so far as the all-time opening weekend record in North America, outgrossing Avengers: Endgame with $360m, and coming in a strong second worldwide, making nearly a billion dollars within four days. What’s more, Brand New Day is keeping pace with a movie that was an all-in team-up event, also sold as a de facto finale. Most of it focuses on the six core Avengers who first assembled in the 2012 smash (plus Ant-Man, Captain Marvel and Rocket Raccoon) but its climax features appearances from just about every major MCU character brought back from the dead, including Holland’s Spidey. Brand New Day certainly takes advantage of that same wide cinematic universe, with supporting parts for the Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), the new Black Widow (Florence Pugh), the Punisher (Jon Bernthal), and one major figure from Marvel comics. But that mystery character’s identity wasn’t part of the ad campaign in order to keep the movie’s surprise intact, and the Punisher is from a few Marvel TV shows – not exactly a blockbuster-level draw. No, it’s safe to say that Brand New Day is breaking records – it will become the biggest movie of the year in a matter of days – because of Spider-Man himself.
That means the character, not actor Tom Holland (though his version is obviously popular). Spidey has been posting numbers like this longer than any single movie star: Back in 2002, the Spider-Man film starring Tobey Maguire and directed by Sam Raimi was the first movie to ever open with over $100m at the North American box office, and it sure didn’t have any other marquee heroes helping it along. Combined with the surprise success of an X-Men movie two years earlier, Spider-Man ’02 kicked off a superhero-movie craze – and due respect to Professor X and his noble mission of mutant-human brotherhood, but the Raimi film pulled in well over twice as much. It was a sign that he was attracting audiences beyond the comics-fan faithful, even – cue the nerd sweats – girls!
It’s probably an oversimplification to chalk Spider-Man’s enduring cinematic appeal to a female audience, not least because all three live-action Spider-Man series center a male point of view, unswervingly make the female lead a love interest for Peter Parker, and ignore all of the super-powered women in this corner of comics lore; only the animated Spider-Verse movies get into Ghost Spider, Spider-Woman and so on. (It would also be unfair to deny the existence of female comics fans, excited to see Spider-Man on screen.) But while Kirsten Dunst’s Mary Jane from the Raimi films does play like a damsel frequently in distress – she’s climactically endangered for three movies in a row, and Raimi’s take on gender roles is not exactly forward-thinking – she does have her own hopes, dreams and disappointments. Her feelings are a big part of what drives the emotional core of the much-maligned, underrated Spider-Man 3, just as Peter’s feelings for her drive the action for the first film. In the new movies, the evolving relationship between Peter and MJ (Zendaya, Holland’s real-life spouse) is rarely far from the center of the film. Hell, the obvious affection between Garfield’s Spider-Man and Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy is just about the only thing that makes the abruptly curtailed Amazing Spider-Man movies watchable (and the comics-accurate death of Gwen at the end of the second film probably helped doom it with audiences; it’s a colossal and unearned-feeling downer to kill off your superstar female lead in just the second film).

Tom Holland in Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Photograph: Courtesy of Sony Pictures/Sony Pictures
It doesn’t feel like a coincidence that all three live-action Spider-Man actors dated their co-stars at some point; these are superhero movies that reboot and reconfigure and recast, but never fully dispense with romance. At first, that was very much part of MCU at large; the first two Iron Man movies run on screwball-adjacent byplay between Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) and Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow). But as romance leached out of the MCU following Phase One, replaced with weirdly businesslike allusions to off-screen hookups and breakups, Spider-Man remained at least a little bit lovelorn, perhaps reminding audiences of a crucial human angle missing from big-scale smash-em-ups.
It’s not just the love stories that continually draw audiences to Spider-Man, of course. The character has long resonated as a keen fusion of longtime DC titans Superman and Batman: he’s got the diverse (and potentially playful) power set like Superman, paired with a Clark Kent-like humble-nerd identity; and the relatable angst of Batman, who of course has no fantastical powers and, as such, bumps up against his human limitations. He wasn’t the first Marvel hero, but he’s probably the archetypal one, mixing in more overt teen melodrama in an era where Superman was flying further into sci-fi territory.
Adapting Spider-Man into other media has only increased his cachet; toddlers are now routinely shown Spidey and His Amazing Friends, a sort of Marvel version of Paw Patrol that gets them hooked on a version of that mythos early, via Disney+. Yet another Spider-Man advantage, though, is very much the opposite of Disney-umbrella synergy: the movie rights for the character have stayed with Sony since the first film. That’s a big part of why there have been three different Spider-Man actors; Sony has to keep making movies to hang on to the characters. (That’s also why a whole bunch of negligible movies about tertiary Spider-verse characters like Madame Web exist.) Disney’s Marvel Studios still deserves credit for the recent successes; they produce the Holland movies, which are in continuity with their other projects. But there’s still probably some manner of negotiation in terms of their timing and, at least with Brand New Day, maybe their creative direction. Holland has told the press that his experience making The Odyssey inspired him to push for a more disciplined approach to Marvel’s assembly line. For her part, Zendaya seems to have brought in Justin Kuritzkes, screenwriter for her film Challengers, to punch up some of the character work. (He receives an “additional literary material” credit.)

Tom Holland and Jon Bernthal in Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Photograph: Sony Pictures/AP
The stars and film-makers working to make Brand New Day feel more like its own movie with some fun Marvel tie-ins, rather than the latest Marvel homework assignment, may have put it over the top in terms of good buzz and a huge opening in the wake of The Odyssey. (The promotion of having three of its main actors – Holland, Zendaya and Bernthal all appear in both! – shared with the second-biggest movie of the summer couldn’t have hurt, either.) But Spider-Man movies are also notable for their consistency. The series’ biggest disaster, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, still pulled in $700m worldwide. (As far as low points go, that actually beats Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Iron Man, Captain America … pretty much everyone.) The first film premiered less than a year after the 9/11 attacks on the US – an early trailer was pulled because it consisted of a visual-effects sight gag where a bad guys’ helicopter got caught in a Spidey web spun between the two towers of the World Trade Center – and while the world has changed plenty in the past quarter-century, it does feel as if Spider-Man is the most enduring film character of the new millennium so far.
It might be a little trite to suggest that a movie in production well before 9/11, featuring a character that had been beloved for decades and earmarked for a big-screen debut for ages (James Cameron wrote a detailed treatment in the 1990s in preparation for a version that never came to pass), received such a franchise-long boost from a single historical event. But in retrospect, it is difficult to picture these Spider-Man movies working quite so well in the 1970s/80s of the original Superman movies (which clearly influenced Raimi’s films) or the 1980s/90s of the early Batman cycle, with their ornate, almost otherworldly spectacle. It’s as if Spider-Man needed to accumulate some eras to throw back to while also moving past those previous icons.
The forward progress has always been subdued; the first movie is the only one to really make much of post-9/11 New York City, and only obliquely, in a scene where citizens rise up and help Spider-Man, declaring “you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us!” (This protective togetherness is further echoed in the sequel’s subway rescue sequence, though there it takes on more of a pseudo-religious aura that’s surprisingly touching all these many years later.) Well into the 2020s, Spidey is still foiling old-timey bank robberies; there may not be sacks of money with dollar signs on them, but there might as well be. That he’s doing this casually using invasive, illegal surveillance equipment marks him as a truly well-integrated post-9/11 superhero, while Marvel mutes real-world allegory elsewhere in their increasingly insular universe. Even if his nominal co-parent is just another flavor of multinational corporation, the current Spidey being of the MCU but not Disney-exclusive sets him ever-so-slightly apart from his many famous co-stars. Worlds end and new phases begin for the original Avengers; two appear to be actually-for-real-dead, while others threaten to age out of their costumes (or, worse, age back in when they don’t know what else to do).
This should be a bigger problem for Spider-Man, a character who, despite the second part of his moniker and a whole lot of comics stories where he’s an adult, is largely thought of as a perpetual teenager. Yet as often as he’s been recast back to high school in the movies, he stays in the culture’s good graces and captures a range of demographics. Maybe it’s because that endless cycle that’s supposed to be the sign of a soulless, deathless franchise actually (however accidentally) has come to resemble the kind of endless struggle that made the character so refreshing in the first place. Even when he’s making billions in days, he’s a superhero who remains an unambiguous work in progress.
Source note
First published by The Guardian Culture
This article was supplied by The Guardian Culture through its RSS feed and formatted for Crooli Signal. The reporting remains with the original publisher.
Read the original at The Guardian Culture


